The researchers comparing peak flows from design storms and historical storms used different catchments and different simulation programs. A comparison of the peak flow frequency results for the Chicago design storm is presented first in this chapter. The results for this storm are summarized in Table 3.
TABLE 3 SUMMARY OF RESULTS FROM PERVIOUS STUDIES (AVERAGE PERCENTAGE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE CHICAGO DESIGN STORM AND HISTORICAL STORM FLOWS)
Study | Catchment | Chicago Design Storm |
---|---|---|
Arnell (1980) | Bergsjon Linkoping 1 Linkoping 2 |
-2.2% |
Marsalek (1979) | Burlington (area 26 ha, imp. 30%) |
80.0% |
Watson (1980) | Pinetown Kew |
2.0% -5.0% |
A study conducted in the IMPSWM program is also presented here. The methodology used to compare the Chicago and SCS 24-hr design storms with the historical storms is given in the second section of the chapter.