Premixed Controls

Observation Possible Cause Recommended Action
Detected cDNA molecule numbers for Spike-in controls are significantly higher (e.g.,>5x) than cDNA molecule numbers for most abundant RNA/DNA clonotypes. Low content or high diversity of immune receptor RNA/DNA genes in the sample, RNA/DNA is degraded or has a wrong concentration. Reduce the amount of Spike-in control mix added to experimental RNA/DNA samples. Measure RNA/DNA concentration, re-purify, replace or use more amount of RNA/DNA samples.
Abundant Spike-in control cDNA molecule numbers are less than 100, low yield of amplified products for both experimental and positive control samples. Possible manual error in the protocol. Add extra cycles in 2nd PCR step, and repeat the AIR protocol using positive control RNA/DNA.
Abundant Spike-in control cDNA molecule numbers are less than 100 for experimental samples but higher (e.g., 500-1,000) for positive control RNA/DNA samples. Presence of inhibitors in RNA samples Add extra cycles in 2nd PCR for experimental samples, use alternative source, or re-purify RNA/DNA samples
Lower than expected 16:4:1 ratio in cDNA molecules for different Spike-in controls. PCR overcycling, background in measurement of AIR control constructs, and not enough NGS reads. Reduce PCR cycle number (in 1st PCR), use control RNA without Spike-in controls to measure Spike-in control background level, replace AIR reagents, use PCR-free area/conditions to re-run AIR assay, use separate test tubes rather than plate to minimize cross-contamination level, run NGS with more reads per sample, optimize parameters for reduction background level based on ration reads per cDNA molecule.
Lower reproducibility in cDNA molecule number between different samples or in triplicates. Not equal concentration of Spike-in controls, Spike-In RNA controls are not fully dissolved (RNA molecules could “stick” to each other), not equal primer extension/amplification conditions for different samples. Heat Spike-in controls at 70°C for 2 min and pipet the whole volume several (e.g., 10) times before use, optimize liquid handling/PCR conditions to have an equal yield of PCR products in triplicate samples and use master mixes for common reagents.

Triplex Isoform Pools

Observation Possible Cause Recommended Action
Low level of cross-contamination between different experimental samples <0.1% or less cross-contamination Based on our experience, a level of cross-contamination less than or equal to 0.1% is commonly detected due to the high sensitivity of AIR assay
High level of cross-contamination between different experimental samples >1% cross-contamination Mistakes in AIR assay conditions or sample handling. Use PCR-free area/conditions to re-run AIR assay, use separate test tubes rather than plate to minimize cross-contamination level, replace AIR reagents, and use control RNA without added Spike-in control as a “negative” control to monitor the level of sample cross-contamination.
Last modified: 24 February 2025

Need more help with this?
Contact Us

Thanks for your feedback.