This defect has been raised because Testimony detected a different output in the RFC.

Defect record for an inbound RFC failure

Looking at the investigate screen, we can see that Testimony has highlighted differences in the PT_JOB_LIST and PT_JOB_METADATA elements of the output.

In this case, the PT_JOB_LIST output area is the most important to look at. (The PT_JOB_METADATA area just defines the fields within the PT_JOB_LIST, so if there are differences in PT_JOB_LIST then there will always be differences in PT_JOB_METADATA.)

Here we can see that in the recording the RFC had two entries in PT_JOB_LIST, whereas in the playback there were 6.

Looking at what’s contained within these rows, we can see that each row relates to a particular document (specified by the DOCID field).

This defect, therefore, has been raised because, either due to sequencing issues or a previously failed transaction, there was a difference in the number of available orders that could be processed by this RFC.


Was this helpful?

Yes No
You indicated this topic was not helpful to you ...
Could you please leave a comment telling us why? Thank you!
Thanks for your feedback.

Post your comment on this topic.

Post Comment