In order to ensure the integrity of the accreditation process, CAPRSS requires the peer reviewers to be impartial and independent from the organizations seeking accreditation.
CAPRSS defines conflict of interest as a relationship or situation in which a peer reviewer is involved that either (a) creates a risk that his/her judgements, decisions, or actions regarding accreditation may be unduly influenced (either favorably or unfavorably), (b) makes it difficult for him/her to full duties impartially, or © puts him/her in a position to exploit the peer reviewer role for personal benefit. A conflict of interest can create an appearance of impropriety, even if no unethical or improper action is taken.
To safeguard again conflict of interests, you are asked to:
- Not accept an assignment to any peer review team where there may be an actual or potential conflict of interest, or the appearance of one.
- Identify and let CAPRSS know any relationships with organizations or individuals that could be perceived as conflict of interest.
- Avoid soliciting employment or consulting opportunities with, or marketing or selling any products or services to, any organization for whom you are a peer reviewer for at least 12 months.
Post your comment on this topic.